Popularity
How popular is J.D. Drew on the internet? The chart below shows the popularity trend over time.
View All »
View images of J.D. Drew in our photo gallery.
View All »
Selected J.D. Drew film and TV show credits.
No records found.
Self
View All »
List of J.D. Drew relationships, in date order.
View All »
Major League batting statistics for J.D. Drew.
| Year |
Team |
G |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
| 1998 |
STL |
14 |
36 |
9 |
15 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
13 |
0 |
4 |
10 |
0.417 |
0.463 |
0.972 |
| 1999 |
STL |
104 |
368 |
72 |
89 |
16 |
6 |
13 |
39 |
19 |
50 |
77 |
0.242 |
0.340 |
0.424 |
| 2000 |
STL |
135 |
407 |
73 |
120 |
17 |
2 |
18 |
57 |
17 |
67 |
99 |
0.295 |
0.401 |
0.479 |
| 2001 |
STL |
109 |
375 |
80 |
121 |
18 |
5 |
27 |
73 |
13 |
57 |
75 |
0.323 |
0.414 |
0.613 |
| 2002 |
STL |
135 |
424 |
61 |
107 |
19 |
1 |
18 |
56 |
8 |
57 |
104 |
0.252 |
0.349 |
0.429 |
| 2003 |
STL |
100 |
287 |
60 |
83 |
13 |
3 |
15 |
42 |
2 |
36 |
48 |
0.289 |
0.374 |
0.512 |
| 2004 |
ATL |
145 |
518 |
118 |
158 |
28 |
8 |
31 |
93 |
12 |
118 |
116 |
0.305 |
0.436 |
0.569 |
| 2005 |
LAD |
72 |
252 |
48 |
72 |
12 |
1 |
15 |
36 |
1 |
51 |
50 |
0.286 |
0.412 |
0.520 |
| 2006 |
LAD |
146 |
494 |
84 |
140 |
34 |
6 |
20 |
100 |
2 |
89 |
106 |
0.283 |
0.393 |
0.498 |
| 2007 |
BOS |
140 |
466 |
84 |
126 |
30 |
4 |
11 |
64 |
4 |
79 |
100 |
0.270 |
0.373 |
0.423 |
| 2008 |
BOS |
109 |
368 |
79 |
103 |
23 |
4 |
19 |
64 |
4 |
79 |
80 |
0.280 |
0.408 |
0.519 |
| 2009 |
BOS |
137 |
452 |
84 |
126 |
30 |
4 |
24 |
68 |
2 |
82 |
109 |
0.279 |
0.392 |
0.522 |
| 2010 |
BOS |
139 |
478 |
69 |
122 |
24 |
2 |
22 |
68 |
3 |
60 |
105 |
0.255 |
0.341 |
0.452 |
| 2011 |
BOS |
81 |
248 |
23 |
55 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
22 |
0 |
33 |
58 |
0.222 |
0.315 |
0.302 |
| Career |
1566 |
5173 |
944 |
1437 |
273 |
48 |
242 |
795 |
87 |
862 |
1137 |
- |
- |
- |
View All »
Major League fielding statistics for J.D. Drew.
| Year |
Team |
G |
GS |
Inn |
PO |
A |
E |
DP |
Fld% |
| 1998 |
STL |
11 |
8 |
75 |
19 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1.000 |
| 1999 |
STL |
98 |
93 |
807 |
236 |
9 |
7 |
6 |
0.972 |
| 2000 |
STL |
127 |
108 |
988 |
248 |
6 |
9 |
2 |
0.966 |
| 2001 |
STL |
107 |
104 |
899 |
209 |
7 |
6 |
1 |
0.973 |
| 2002 |
STL |
120 |
108 |
946 |
223 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
0.987 |
| 2003 |
STL |
75 |
70 |
587 |
154 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
0.994 |
| 2004 |
ATL |
142 |
142 |
1,242 |
296 |
13 |
3 |
0 |
0.990 |
| 2005 |
LAD |
72 |
72 |
623 |
147 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0.987 |
| 2006 |
LAD |
135 |
131 |
1,118 |
284 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
0.983 |
| 2007 |
BOS |
135 |
126 |
1,091 |
224 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
0.974 |
| 2008 |
BOS |
106 |
105 |
891 |
184 |
6 |
4 |
1 |
0.979 |
| 2009 |
BOS |
132 |
124 |
1,083 |
242 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
0.992 |
| 2010 |
BOS |
133 |
127 |
1,102 |
234 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0.996 |
| 2011 |
BOS |
76 |
65 |
587 |
146 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.000 |
| Career |
1469 |
1383 |
- |
2846 |
71 |
49 |
17 |
- |